British reporting of the Euro elections won’t help
anyone make sense of what has happened in the EU. Great clouds of Farage
gleefully fanned around by Fleet Street obscure the view . A deep commitment by
the news papers not to report what happens in Southern Europe doesn’t help. The
gains for the far right were truly worrying, but there were also gains by the
left.
But it is easy to paint a fair picture in broad
strokes. The details are different in each nation, depending how and how much
the different parties have seized on the crisis. But the big picture looks like
this.
The crisis has broken many people away from the main
centre parties. Stagnant wages, social cuts, businesses going bust make people
very unhappy. And that makes them unhappy with the mainstream parties –
Conservative and Social Democrat – who were in power when the crisis hit. They
blame the mainstream parties for creating the crisis, especially as many of the
politicians personally enriched themselves in the process: During the boom, bankers
were allowed to invest in risky, speculative and dangerous schemes – including
completely fraudulent and artificial ones. Local politicians and their business
friends enriched themselves – often corruptly – in these schemes. Few were
prosecuted when they fell apart in the financial crisis, but jobs, social
spending and small businesses did suffer in the slump.
Former Tory voters – both suburban middle class and
working class Tories – are more likely to vote to the right of the mainstream.
Former Socialist voters are more likely to break to the left. The right wing
parties blame immigrants for the crisis, the left wing ones put blame on the
banks. The proportion of people breaking from the mainstream parties is not
fixed, and it is the job of active socialist campaigners to shift the balance in
favour of the left wing break.
In Northern Europe the right wing parties did better,
in Southern Europe the left made more breakthroughs: This reflects an economic
as well as a geographic reality, and for this map, Ireland heads southward.
This puts pressure on the EU in both cases, but for very different reasons. In
Northern Europe, right wing parties like UKIP or the Front National blame the
EU for immigration. In Southern Europe people blame the EU for forcing the
banker’s agenda. This part of the picture is barely described on the UK TV news
or on the British front pages. Words like “Troika” and “Debt” and
“Restructuring” which are central to the Euro elections are absent from too
much British reporting. The crisis was caused by the banks, but the solution
has been to cut ordinary people’s living standards to bail the banks out,
leaving the bankers rich and dominant. In Greece or Spain or Portugal, the EU
is the instrument used to force people to pay the banker’s price: Southern
Europeans hate The “Troika” made up of
the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International
Monetary Fund which arranged the bail-out. This will sound odd in the UK,
because the press haven’t really explained how the bailout works for Southern
Europe. How can people in Southern Europe hate the bail outs ? The answer is,
because they bailed out the bankers at the people’s cost: The bail outs were
given so that EU countries could pay their debts to banks: In effect the bankers
were bailed out. The “Troika “ did negotiate “haircuts”, where the bankers
agreed to take less than the full debt (because without “haircuts”, the debts were
unpayable and they would have faced default). But they negotiated far harsher
social “haircuts”, enforcing cuts in social spending and austerity to fund the
bailouts. The EU, as part of the Troika, are a mechanism to take money of
ordinary Spanish or Portuguese or Greek pockets and pass them on to the banking
system. The Troika is enforcing wage cuts, spending cuts and privatisation to
bail out the banks.
Hence the growth of Left wing parties who are angry at
the EU in Southern Europe. This includes results for groups based on the traditional Communist
left or some variety of the “new left”
or some combination of the both . Newer organisations included Syriza in Greece,
Podemos in Spain or O Bloco in Portugal.
More traditional Communist Party-ish organisations like Izquierda Unida (united Left) in Spain
Some standouts
of the Euro Elections
(1) If
you want votes, get active in the streets – Syriza and Podemos built whole new parties not just
by issuing manifestos , but by a hard , broad struggle of demonstrations,
strikes and meetings.Podemos were able to relate to the "Indignados" who occupied Spanish squares in a rebellion over the economic crisis. In the process Podemos helped make the Indignados much more a part of the left. In turn, this gave a new language to the left:- A party called "Yes We Can" formed out of the "Indignant" is quite clearly finding a new way of talking about social change.
(2) Italy
was the worst “Southern European “ result for the left, with Beppo Grillo’s
“Five Star” movement filling the space that the left took in neighbouring countries.
Grillo’s party is a bit like if voters got so sick of politicians that they
voted for a ‘Topical Comedy Panel Show’
instead : Sneery, but are they pretty right wing (Jimmy Carr?) or sort of left-ish
(Phil Jupitus?). Grillo is making friends with Farage, so it looks more Jimmy
Carr.
(3) Even
among bad results there are good moments – Italy elected Three MEPs from a party called “Anther Europe With
Alex Tsipras”. Tsipras is the leader of the Greek party Syriza – so this is the
equivalent of British voters electing four French socialist radicals as the
MEP’s for London or Manchester or Leeds or Bristol.
(4) Even
in the EU “North” there were some good results . The Front National winning the
French EU elections was a very bad problem: Marine Le Pen’s party are full fat
fascism compared to the semi-skimmed right wing populism of UKIP. But even in
France the left had some good results. Melenchon’s Left Front had four seats. France’s “Green” party EELV,
which is a left-ish leaning party took 6 seats.
(5) One
of the more standout results from Northern Europe was the first Feminist Initiative
MEP elected. Soraya Post is the first MEP ever elected under the “Feminist”
banner. Her election slogan was “Out with Racists and in with Feminists”. In a
charmingly Swedish touch, the Feminist Initiative has been built with the hard
work of many members , aided by a donation of around £80k from Benny from Abba.
So beyond the headlines about extreme right success,
there were also gains for the left : Gains made by new
left wing groups who were able to use new language, form new alliances and find new ways of relating to movements on the street.
No comments:
Post a Comment